Case Report
Synchronous bilateral male breast cancer: A case report and review of literature
1 Medical Student, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America
2 MD, Resident Physician, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, United States of America
3 MD, MPH, Resident Physician, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, United States of America
4 Associate Clinical Professor, Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, United States of America
Address correspondence to:
Erin Lin
DO, Associate Clinical Professor of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, 3800 Chapman Ave, Suite 6200, Orange, CA 92868-3298,
United States of America
Access full text article on other devices
Access PDF of article on other devices
Article ID: 100127Z12ND2023
doi: 10.5348/100127Z12ND2023CR
How to cite this article
Dunn N, Nguyen PD, Yuen SW, Lin E. Synchronous bilateral male breast cancer: A case report and review of literature. J Case Rep Images Surg 2023;9(2):32–39.ABSTRACT
Introduction: Male synchronous bilateral breast cancer, defined as contralateral breast cancer diagnosed within 12 months of a previous breast cancer, is extraordinarily rare. This case report aims to provide improved understanding of the nuances in presentation, associated risk factors, and treatment options of synchronous bilateral male breast cancer.
Case Report: A 68-year-old man presented with a one-month history of palpable bilateral retroareolar breast masses. He underwent workup with a bilateral breast ultrasound which showed an irregular hypoechoic mass 8 × 8 × 6 cm in the right breast at 7 o’clock in the retroareolar region and an oval hypoechoic mass 7 × 4 × 7 cm with indistinct margins in the left breast at 8 o’clock in the retroareolar region. Subsequent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies revealed right breast moderately differentiated invasive ductal carcinoma and left breast high grade ductal carcinoma in situ. He underwent a bilateral simple mastectomy with bilateral axillary sentinel lymph node biopsies and was started on anastrozole at his initial post-operative visit. Four-month surveillance imaging with computed tomography chest, abdomen, pelvis, and dual X-ray absorptiometry showed no evidence of local recurrence or metastases.
Conclusion: Male breast cancer commonly presents as a painless retroareolar mass. Workup should include imaging studies to localize and characterize the lesion and tissue diagnosis via core needle biopsy. Treatment of male breast cancer largely includes simple mastectomy with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Future breast cancer studies should include male cohorts to improve our understanding and treatment options between the two sexes.
Introduction
Male breast cancer is an uncommon diagnosis that accounts for less than 1% of all diagnosed breast cancers worldwide [1],[2],[3],[4]. Male synchronous bilateral breast cancer, defined as a contralateral breast cancer diagnosed within 12 months of a previous breast cancer, is extraordinarily rare and the number of these reports are limited [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9]. Due to the rarity of male breast cancer and subsequent lack of randomized control trials, the paucity of data lends to extrapolation of many treatment decisions from the management of female breast cancer. While there are similarities in the presentation and management between men and women, there are also notable differences in epidemiology, risk factors, and tumor characteristics. Additional research is necessary to further elucidate the risk factors and optimal treatment modalities for male breast cancer. This case report and review of literature aims to provide improved understanding of the nuances in presentation, associated risk factors, and treatment options of synchronous bilateral male breast cancer.
Case Report
A 68-year-old man presented with a one-month history of palpable bilateral retroareolar breast masses. Both masses enlarged in size with worsening tenderness; however, he did not experience nipple discharge, breast skin changes, significant weight changes, shortness of breath, or bone pain. He had no known history of trauma to either breast or any new medications. His medical and surgical history was significant for a 30-year history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) well controlled with antiretroviral therapy, remote history of left forehead squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to the left parotid gland that underwent Mohs surgery and left superficial parotidectomy with modified radical neck dissection and adjuvant radiation therapy. Patient’s pertinent family history included a sister with a diagnosis of breast cancer, but no known family genetic history of BRCA 1 or 2. The patient had a 40-pack-year history but had quit tobacco use 10 years prior and denied a history of alcohol or substance use.
He underwent workup with a bilateral breast ultrasound which showed an irregular hypoechoic mass 8 × 8 × 6 cm in the right breast at 7 o’clock in the retroareolar region and an oval hypoechoic mass 7 × 4 × 7 cm with indistinct margins in the left breast at 8 o’clock in the retroareolar region (both American College of Radiology (ACR) BI-RADS Category 4) (Figure 1). Subsequent ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies revealed right breast moderately differentiated invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and left breast high grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Immunohistochemistry on both masses was estrogen receptor positive (90%) and progesterone receptor positive (80%). The right breast IDC was E-cadherin positive, HER-2 negative, and had a Ki-67 of 40%. The left breast DCIS had positive CK5/6 and P63. Bilateral breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed both masses abutting the nipples; however, there was no evidence of suspicious lymphadenopathy (ACR BI-RADS Category 6) (Figure 2). Computed tomography (CT) chest was negative for metastatic spread to the lungs (Figure 3). Genetic testing via Myriad myRisk Hereditary Cancer revealed a deletion mutation of BRCA2 c.5146_5149del (p.Tyr1716Lysfs*8), causing premature truncation of the BRCA2 protein with associated increased cancer risk.
He underwent a bilateral simple mastectomy with bilateral axillary sentinel lymph node biopsies and soft tissue flap reconstruction approximately one month from initial presentation. We opted to excise his nipple areolar complex due to retroareolar location of bilateral breast masses (Figure 4). Frozen section microscopy for bilateral axillary sentinel nodes were negative for carcinoma. Local soft tissue flaps were raised and used to fill the mastectomy defect. The patient tolerated the procedure well without complication and was discharged on the same day in stable condition. Right breast final pathology showed grade 2 invasive ductal carcinoma measuring 9 mm as the greatest dimension and high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ without lymphovascular invasion and negative resection margins (pT1bN0). Left breast final pathology showed intermediate to high grade DCIS measuring 1.5 cm with negative resection margins (pTisN0).
He progressed in the usual post-operative course and was started on anastrozole at his initial post-operative visit. His four-month surveillance imaging with CT chest, abdomen, pelvis, and dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) had no evidence of local recurrence or metastases. The patient ultimately opted to discontinue any further endocrine therapy at this time. The patient was recommended to undergo breast cancer surveillance screening with annual bilateral breast ultrasounds. Given his BRCA2 mutation, he underwent additional screenings for pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer which were without evidence of malignancy. He was doing well at his ten-month clinic visit without any evidence of local or nodal recurrence.




Discussion
Bilateral synchronous male breast cancer is an extremely uncommon diagnosis and accounts for less than 0.5–0.6% of all diagnosed breast cancers [6]. However, the incidence of male breast cancer has slowly been increasing from 0.96 to 1.08 per 100,000 population [6],[9]. Due to its rare incidence, the various genetic and environmental risk factors for male breast cancer are not well understood. These include family history of breast cancer and genetic factors such as Klinefelter’s syndrome (47, XXY), androgen receptor mutations, or BRCA mutations, with BRCA-2 carrying an 80-fold increased risk of breast cancer compared to the general population. Additionally, hormonal imbalance between estrogen and testosterone has been hypothesized to contribute to the development of male breast cancer including obesity, testicular disease (mumps, orchitis, orchiectomy, undescended testis, and cryptorchidism), liver disease contributing to hyperestrogenic states, and radiation exposure [1],[2],[3],[5],[9].
Male breast cancer differs from female breast cancer in prevalence, signs and symptoms, imaging validity, and treatment plans. The mean age at diagnosis for males is 67, which is five years later than women [10]. Additionally, the mean tumor size is often larger, with more frequent nodal involvement, higher frequency of androgen and estrogen receptor positivity, and higher stage [3],[10]. Like females, the most common type of male breast cancer is invasive carcinoma with the most common histologic type being invasive ductal carcinoma [3]. Common presentations of male breast cancer include a painless palpable retroareolar mass, nipple retraction, skin ulceration, bloody nipple discharge, and palpable axillary lymphadenopathy, many of which are similar to the signs and symptoms of female breast cancer and should warrant further workup in such patients [3],[9],[11]. However, since male breast tissue is often undersized, it has been shown that the nipple is most commonly involved at earlier stages and the mass is often localized to the subareolar region, with less frequency in the upper outer quadrant compared to women [11],[12]. Like female breast cancer, the first line method for diagnosis is mammography, which is highly sensitive (~92%) and specific (~90%), usually appearing as a unilateral, distinct density with irregular margins [3],[11],[13]. Use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to be variable in its clinical use, with some sources stating its use to be limited in male cases, while others reporting that it is recommended in cases when initial imaging is indeterminate and can be successful in assessment of the male breast [1]. Unlike in women, ultrasound has been shown to not be as useful for the primary diagnosis but can be used to supplement the aforementioned cross-sectional imaging, especially when patients are younger than 25 years. An ultrasound suggestive of breast cancer shows a unifocal solid, hypoechoic mass with irregular margins, often with axillary nodes enlarged [13]. According to the ACR Appropriateness Criteria, if there is an indeterminate breast mass found, the initial recommended imaging study is ultrasound if the male patient is younger than age 25 and mammography if the patient is older than age 25 [14]. Similarly to women, core needle biopsy is the standard of care to establish a histologic diagnosis [9].
Due to the rarity of male breast cancer and subsequent lack of randomized prospective studies in this population, the treatment of early-stage male breast cancer is typically extrapolated from that of early-stage female breast cancer with upfront oncologic resection followed by adjuvant endocrine treatment, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, depending on varying prognostic factors [11]. Historically, radical mastectomy began as the main surgical intervention for breast cancer, but was gradually replaced by less invasive surgical interventions, with a shift toward modified radical mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection in the 1970s. Since that time, as axillary dissections have become less common, simple mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy is largely the treatment of choice. Per the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines, this treatment algorithm is also appropriate for men. Breast conserving surgery is a common approach for women with early-stage breast cancer; however, this is rarely performed in males. Following surgery, like women, ASCO recommends that men with hormone receptor positive breast cancer should be offered adjuvant endocrine therapy, such as tamoxifen, for an initial duration of five years. If contraindicated, patients may also be offered a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist with an aromatase inhibitor [15],[16],[17]. Those who still have a high risk of recurrence can continue hormone therapy for an additional five years. Unfortunately, while a survival benefit has been demonstrated with adjuvant hormone therapy, many men choose to discontinue therapy due to frequent side effects, including weight gain and decreased libido [16].
While radiotherapy is mandatory with breast conserving surgery in women, there is differing data regarding the benefit of radiation therapy following mastectomy in males, who more often undergo simple or modified radical mastectomies [18],[19],[20],[21]. Because male breast cancer is often more aggressive and found in advanced stages, adjuvant loco-regional radiotherapy is more frequently performed than with female breast cancer [12]. While some studies have shown radiotherapy to improve local recurrence or overall survival rates, especially those with positive lymph nodes, these arguments for other subgroups of patients are not yet widely supported [18]. Recommendations for radiotherapy are otherwise similar between males and females and indications for radiation in male breast cancer include tumor size larger than 5 cm, positive lymph nodes, or positive resection margins [11]. Additionally, chemotherapy indications and prognostic factors frequently used in women can also be applied to men, including positive nodal disease tumors larger than 1 cm or those negative for hormone receptors [11],[22]. Table 1 summarizes published case reports since 2000 to include pathology, treatment, and outcome.
Unfortunately, there are no current widely adopted or screening guidelines for male breast cancer, even for those with known genetic mutations [4]. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend screening high risk males (strong family history or genetic predisposition) with monthly self-examinations and annual physical exams starting at age 35 [4],[12]. While the incidence of male breast cancer is low, providers should still be cognizant of these associations. Once symptoms or presentation is recognized, increased awareness and further investigation into the proper workup of male breast cancer will prevent delays in both diagnosis and treatment for many patients. In addition to the physical aspects of male breast cancer, the diagnosis carries its own psychological burden, as it is often viewed as a “cancer of a female,” due to the increased incidence in women compared to men. It is important that male patients be offered resources to address the additional mental health impacts from their diagnosis.

Conclusion
Male breast cancer commonly presents as a painless retroareolar mass. Workup should include imaging studies to localize and characterize the lesion and tissue diagnosis via core needle biopsy. Treatment of male breast cancer largely includes simple mastectomy with adjuvant endocrine therapy. Future breast cancer studies should include male cohorts to improve our understanding and treatment options between the two sexes.
REFERENCE
1.
Özgür C, Sunal BS, Tunçbilek N. A rare case of bilateral synchronous male breast cancer: A multimodality approach. Eur J Breast Health 2022;18(2):199–202. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
2.
Forloni F, Giovilli M, Pecis C, et al. Pituitary prolactinsecreting macroadenoma combined with bilateral breast cancer in a 45-year-old male. J Endocrinol Invest 2001;24(6):454–9. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
3.
Okada K, Kajiwara S, Tanaka H, Sakamoto G. Synchronous bilateral noninvasive ductal carcinoma of the male breast: A case report. Breast Cancer 2003;10(2):163–6. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
4.
Lambley J, Maguire E, Lam KY. Synchronous bilateral breast cancer in an elderly man. Breast J 2005;11(2):153. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
5.
Melenhorst J, van Berlo CL, Nijhuis PH. Simultaneous bilateral breast cancer in a male: A case report and review of the literature. Acta Chir Belg 2005;105(5):531–2. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
6.
Franceschini G, D’Alba P, Costantini M, et al. Synchronous bilateral breast carcinoma in a 50-year-old man with 45,X/46,XY mosaic karyotype: Report of a case. Surg Today 2006;36(1):71–5. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
7.
Staerkle RF, Lenzlinger PM, Suter SL, Varga Z, Melcher GA. Synchronous bilateral ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast associated with gynecomastia in a 30-year-old patient following repeated injections of stanozolol. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006;97(2):173–6. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
8.
Sosnovskikh I, Naninato P, Gatti G, et al. Synchronous bilateral breast cancer in men: A case report and review of the literature. Tumori 2007;93(2):225–7. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
9.
Hirose Y, Sasa M, Bando Y, et al. Bilateral male breast cancer with male potential hypogonadism. World J Surg Oncol 2007;5:60. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
10.
Qureshi K, Athwal R, Cropp G, Basit A, Adjogatse J, Bhogal RH. Bilateral synchronous ductal carcinoma in situ in a young man: Case report and review of the literature. Clin Breast Cancer 2007;7(9):710–2. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
11.
Ucar AE, Korukluoglu B, Ergul E, Aydin R, Kusdemir A. Bilateral Paget disease of the male nipple: First report. Breast 2008;17(3):317–8. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
12.
Spencer JT, Shutter J. Synchronous bilateral invasive lobular breast cancer presenting as carcinomatosis in a male. Am J Surg Pathol 2009;33(3):470–4. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
13.
Maksimovic S. Bilateral breast carcinoma in patients with Klinefeleter syndrome: Report of case. Med Arh 2010;64(4):250–2.
[Pubmed]
14.
Yaman E, Ozturk B, Coskun U, et al. Synchronous bilateral breast cancer in an aged male patient. Onkologie 2010;33(5):255–8. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
15.
Hoque HMR, Kothari A, Hamed H, Fentiman IS. Synchronous bilateral breast cancer in a patient with Klinefelter’s syndrome. Int J Gen Med 2010;3:19–21.
[Pubmed]
16.
Noor L, McGovern P, Bhaskar P, Lowe JW. Bilateral DCIS following gynecomastia surgery. Role of nipple sparing mastectomy. A case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2011;2(6):106–8. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
17.
Lemoine C, Mayer SK, Beaunoyer M, Mongeau C, Ouimet A. Incidental finding of synchronous bilateral ductal carcinoma in situ associated with gynecomastia in a 15-year-old obese boy: Case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46(9):e17–20. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
18.
Al-Saleh N. Bilateral ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in a male breast: A case report. Gulf J Oncolog 2011;(9):68–72.
[Pubmed]
19.
Sun WY, Lee KH, Lee HC, et al. Synchronous bilateral male breast cancer: A case report. J Breast Cancer 2012;15(2):248–51. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
20.
Chern J, Liao L, Baraldi R, Tinney E, Hendershott K, Germaine P. Case report: Ductal carcinoma in situ in the male breast. Case Rep Radiol 2012;2012:532527. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
21.
Rubio Hernández MC, Díaz Prado YI, Pérez SR, Díaz RR, Aleaga ZG. Synchronous bilateral breast cancer in a male. Ecancermedicalscience 2013;7:377. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
22.
García-Mejido JA, Delgado-Jiménez C, Gutiérrez-Palomino L, Sánchez-Sevilla M, Iglesias-Bravo E, Caballero-Fernández V. Synchronous bilateral breast cancer in a male. [Article in Spanish]. Cir Cir 2013;81(3):225–7.
[Pubmed]
23.
Takalkar UV, Asegaonkar SB, Asegaonkar BN, Kodlikeri PR. Bilateral synchronous breast cancer in an elderly man: A case report. International Journal of Case Reports and Images 2014;2(5):118–21. [CrossRef]
24.
Jagtap SV, Chougule PG, Khatib W, Shukla DB, Jagtap SS. Male breast cancer: Presenting as synchronous, large, bilateral masses. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8(4):FD07–8. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
25.
Nwashilli NJ, Ugiagbe EE. Bilateral synchronous male breast cancer. Saudi Med J 2015;36(3):359–62. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
26.
Zangouri V, Karami MY, Mokhtari M, et al. Bilateral synchronous male breast cancer in Iran: A case report. Middle East Journal of Cancer 2016;7(4):215–9.
27.
Frey JD, Baskin BL, Roses DF. Bilateral, synchronous breast carcinoma in monozygotic male twins with multi-system developmental anomalies: Proposition of a congenital etiology. Breast J 2016;22(1):124–6. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
28.
Akinc? M, Keklikk?ran Z, Dinçer M. Synchronous bilateral male breast cancer: A rare case report. Med Bull Haseki 2019;57(3):336–8. [CrossRef]
29.
Lehrberg A, Bensenhaver J. A rare presentation of bilateral, synchronous male breast cancer. Breast J 2020;26(4):759–61. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
30.
Kadam SS, Kanitkar G, Dolas S, Phadke S. Bilateral synchronous breast cancer in elderly male. Indian J Surg Oncol 2020;11(1):25–7. [CrossRef]
[Pubmed]
31.
Kanayama M, Nakatsukasa K, Onishi M, et al. A case of synchronous bilateral male breast cancer. [Article in Japanese]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2020;47(6):973– 6.
[Pubmed]
32.
Horta R, Schmitt F, Pereira N, Gervásio H. Accidental finding of synchronous bilateral ductal carcinoma in situ in a young man referred to mastectomy due to gynecomastia – and what if liposuction have been used? Case report. Acta Chir Plast 2020;62(1–2):46–9.
[Pubmed]
33.
Sharbatdaran A, Twam M, Nikbakhsh N, Ghorbane H. Bilateral breast cancer in a 65-year-old man. Arch Clin Med Case Rep 2022;6(1):116–22. [CrossRef]
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Author Contributions
Natassia Dunn - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Peter D Nguyen - Conception of the work, Design of the work, Acquisition of data, Analysis of data, Drafting the work, Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Sarah W Yuen - Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Erin Lin - Revising the work critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published, Agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
AcknowledgmentsThe authors do not have additional acknowledgments.
Data Availability StatementThe corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Consent For PublicationWritten informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.
Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Competing InterestsAuthors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright© 2023 Natassia Dunn et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.